Since his first start, Cole Hamels stats are:
8-1, 88 IP, 61 hits, 88 strikeouts, 16 walks, 2.04 ERA, 0.88 WHIP.
He looks better every time out on the mound.
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Friday, May 27, 2011
Slide or surrender Dorothy
I don't really understand the fuss about the Buster Posey play. Would anyone give a hoot if Dane Sardinha had gotten run over? But he probably wouldn't, because he's been a catcher for a long time and knows better. Buster Posey is a young, inexperienced catcher who made a rookie mistake.
The rules of baseball are explicit regarding obstruction. A player who does not have the ball may not block a base. Period. The fact that the rule tends to be ignored at home plate does not make it any less a rule. If we don't want catchers to be blindsided, teach them to not get in front of the plate until they have the ball, especially when the throw is coming from right field.
Could the guy have slid? Of course, but if a catcher has the plate blocked and the ball is coming from right field, it's going to be a difficult tag and the catcher probably won't have perfect control of the ball. So if you don't have a clear path to the plate, jarring the ball loose by running through the catcher is a good option.
I would hate it if they change the rule to "slide or surrender." That's a nice rule for adult softball, but I don't think it even belongs in little league. Yeah, I know, prevent injuries, blah blah blah. It's sports. If you take the physical part out of sports you might as not bother. It's all part of the Global War On Fun, imposed by baby boomers on their kids to make sure that nothing that they did to have fun when they were young is available to their kids.
And there really are few things as entertaining as a good play at the plate, with the catcher receiving the throw and trying to turn and tag all at the same time and the runner coming full tilt, able to approach the plate in a bunch of different ways. It's one of the most compelling moments in sports. And as fans, we don't deserve to have it taken way because one famous player got hurt.
The rules of baseball are explicit regarding obstruction. A player who does not have the ball may not block a base. Period. The fact that the rule tends to be ignored at home plate does not make it any less a rule. If we don't want catchers to be blindsided, teach them to not get in front of the plate until they have the ball, especially when the throw is coming from right field.
Could the guy have slid? Of course, but if a catcher has the plate blocked and the ball is coming from right field, it's going to be a difficult tag and the catcher probably won't have perfect control of the ball. So if you don't have a clear path to the plate, jarring the ball loose by running through the catcher is a good option.
I would hate it if they change the rule to "slide or surrender." That's a nice rule for adult softball, but I don't think it even belongs in little league. Yeah, I know, prevent injuries, blah blah blah. It's sports. If you take the physical part out of sports you might as not bother. It's all part of the Global War On Fun, imposed by baby boomers on their kids to make sure that nothing that they did to have fun when they were young is available to their kids.
And there really are few things as entertaining as a good play at the plate, with the catcher receiving the throw and trying to turn and tag all at the same time and the runner coming full tilt, able to approach the plate in a bunch of different ways. It's one of the most compelling moments in sports. And as fans, we don't deserve to have it taken way because one famous player got hurt.
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Great lines you hear at a Phillies game
I wish I could definitively remember which play this was, but the Phillies' (lack of) offense today was all so dreadful it kind of just blends together. I want to say it was Howard's strikeout on three pitches in the bottom of the ninth. Regardless, following the play, one of our Sunday regulars sitting behind us remarked: "Wow, the crowd didn't even boo. We are so disgusted that we aren't even booing anymore. And for Phillies fans, that's really saying something."
Sigh. And I didn't even get on the Bongo Cam.
Sigh. And I didn't even get on the Bongo Cam.
Blast From the Past
I remember when our Philadelphia baseball team scored four runs.
If you haven't heard of this kid yet, shame on you
My dad always gives me the job of scouting prospects before Rotisserie drafts. He's never really made it a priority but has always wanted to, and I love discovering new talent so I eagerly volunteer for the job.
Last year, my great call was Neftali Feliz. Can't say I'm upset to see him on the bench while the Rangers are playing the Phillies, but in any other situation, he's my man.
This year, my rookie pick was Michael Pineda. I'm sorry, let me just take a moment here to pat myself on the back, because this kid is boss. Like I said, if you haven't heard of him by now, shame on you. Granted, he is on Seattle, meaning that he suffers from what I like to call Ichiro Syndrome (Felix Hernandez does as well). Basically, it is as simple as: On Seattle, everyone forgets about you, despite the fact that you quietly remain one of the dominant players in the league.
So here are the no nonsense stats. No analysis or filler, just cold hard facts that speak for themselves. Keep in mind: He is on Seattle. This team DOES NOT HIT. (Oh, and did I mention he's 22?)
W-L: 6-2, (1 ND) ERA: 2.16, 58.1 IP, 41 hits, 14 earned runs, 61 strikeouts, 14 walks, .193 batting avg. against, and a .94 WHIP. Enough said, right?
This guy looks like he's trying to become Seattle's ace. You'd think no one would dare challenge King Felix's reign at No. 1, but I mean, Felix's numbers this season? Not quite as impressive. None of his numbers are as good as Pineda's in 2011 at this point, with the exception of strikeouts (he has 64, not really much of a difference). This is not to discount Felix's abilities by any means. It is just to point out that my man Pineda has better numbers than the reigning AL Cy Young and we're almost to June.
Last year, my great call was Neftali Feliz. Can't say I'm upset to see him on the bench while the Rangers are playing the Phillies, but in any other situation, he's my man.
This year, my rookie pick was Michael Pineda. I'm sorry, let me just take a moment here to pat myself on the back, because this kid is boss. Like I said, if you haven't heard of him by now, shame on you. Granted, he is on Seattle, meaning that he suffers from what I like to call Ichiro Syndrome (Felix Hernandez does as well). Basically, it is as simple as: On Seattle, everyone forgets about you, despite the fact that you quietly remain one of the dominant players in the league.
So here are the no nonsense stats. No analysis or filler, just cold hard facts that speak for themselves. Keep in mind: He is on Seattle. This team DOES NOT HIT. (Oh, and did I mention he's 22?)
W-L: 6-2, (1 ND) ERA: 2.16, 58.1 IP, 41 hits, 14 earned runs, 61 strikeouts, 14 walks, .193 batting avg. against, and a .94 WHIP. Enough said, right?
This guy looks like he's trying to become Seattle's ace. You'd think no one would dare challenge King Felix's reign at No. 1, but I mean, Felix's numbers this season? Not quite as impressive. None of his numbers are as good as Pineda's in 2011 at this point, with the exception of strikeouts (he has 64, not really much of a difference). This is not to discount Felix's abilities by any means. It is just to point out that my man Pineda has better numbers than the reigning AL Cy Young and we're almost to June.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
And another Cardinal bites the dust
Make that 2.
This must be a record year for injuries. Or at least a record for injuries of star players. Chase Utley, Josh Hamilton, Joe Mauer, Grady Sizemore, Johan Santana, Chipper Jones, Adam Wainwright, Zack Greinke, Evan Longoria, Kendrys Morales and Ryan Zimmerman, have all struggled with injuries at some point this year. And those are just the marquee names.
Tonight, the Cardinals lost their corners. Lance Berkman and Matt Holliday, two guys who have been killing it at the plate this season, left mid-game (5th inning and 3rd inning respectively) after making a pair of impressive catches in the outfield against the Astros (of all the teams to do that against...really??). Holliday is atop the NL in batting average with .357, and Berkman is the leading man in RBIs with 35. He also leads the team with 11 homers.
The Cardinals, who already suffered the loss of Adam Wainwright this season to the infamous Tommy John, have been playing impressive ball without their ace. Sitting at a respectable 25-19, St. Louis is in second place in the NL Central, just half a game behind the Reds.
Holliday left tonight's game with "quad tightness" and Berkman with "wrist discomfort", both of which don't soon too serious, but one can never be too careful. Push a little too hard if you're not quite ready to come back and you've got a case of the Jimmy Rollins on your hands. I know the Cards just swept the Phils, but I like St. Louis otherwise, so let's hope that these little tweaks heal themselves and that neither of these guys land on the DL. It would really be a shame.
This must be a record year for injuries. Or at least a record for injuries of star players. Chase Utley, Josh Hamilton, Joe Mauer, Grady Sizemore, Johan Santana, Chipper Jones, Adam Wainwright, Zack Greinke, Evan Longoria, Kendrys Morales and Ryan Zimmerman, have all struggled with injuries at some point this year. And those are just the marquee names.
Tonight, the Cardinals lost their corners. Lance Berkman and Matt Holliday, two guys who have been killing it at the plate this season, left mid-game (5th inning and 3rd inning respectively) after making a pair of impressive catches in the outfield against the Astros (of all the teams to do that against...really??). Holliday is atop the NL in batting average with .357, and Berkman is the leading man in RBIs with 35. He also leads the team with 11 homers.
The Cardinals, who already suffered the loss of Adam Wainwright this season to the infamous Tommy John, have been playing impressive ball without their ace. Sitting at a respectable 25-19, St. Louis is in second place in the NL Central, just half a game behind the Reds.
Holliday left tonight's game with "quad tightness" and Berkman with "wrist discomfort", both of which don't soon too serious, but one can never be too careful. Push a little too hard if you're not quite ready to come back and you've got a case of the Jimmy Rollins on your hands. I know the Cards just swept the Phils, but I like St. Louis otherwise, so let's hope that these little tweaks heal themselves and that neither of these guys land on the DL. It would really be a shame.
YOTR
Last year was the Year Of The Pitcher, and so part of what sportswriters do after a year like that is examine whether the next year is a repeat of what happened last year (YOTP2). But after examining all the data, it seems pretty clear that this year is the Year Of The Rainout.
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Not
I think this Posada thing bears some discussion.
That Bautista guy is definitely a fluke.
The Twins are the class of the AL Central.
The Rays' bullpen is a complete disaster.
Lance Berkman is finished.
Ryan Madson can't close.
This year's big comeback story? Oliver Perez.
That Bautista guy is definitely a fluke.
The Twins are the class of the AL Central.
The Rays' bullpen is a complete disaster.
Lance Berkman is finished.
Ryan Madson can't close.
This year's big comeback story? Oliver Perez.
Monday, May 16, 2011
Mediocrity on parade
I guess the baseball folks would prefer "parity," but I'm not sure which one better suits a situation where only three teams in MLB are more than 6 games over .500, two in the NL East. Think I'm cherry-picking? I'm sorry, there are five teams more than 5 games over. And we're talking about expanding the playoffs to 10 teams? Wow, that'll be awesome!
Really, what we're waiting for here is someone to take control. There are reputed to be a few really good teams out there, but of those 3 teams, only the Phillies are doing what's expected of them.
Really, what we're waiting for here is someone to take control. There are reputed to be a few really good teams out there, but of those 3 teams, only the Phillies are doing what's expected of them.
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Baseball in the underworld
I had a nightmare about a new version of baseball hell. The Yankees and Red Sox are mediocre- say they're 2 games over .500 between them. But they still play 19 times a year, the games still take 4 hours and see-saw back and forth, and there are so many pitches taken that even the baserunners are clearly bored. ESPN tries to liven things up with a box purporting to be the strike zone, even though everyone knows there's no such box. Bobby Valentine is a color commentator and talks more than the other 2 people in the booth combined.
Oh, wait, that's not a nightmare. That's tonight's game.
Oh, wait, that's not a nightmare. That's tonight's game.
Apparently, last season was not a fluke.
Who is Jose Bautista? Like really? Someone please tell me, because there's no way it's the same Jose Bautista who averaged 15 home runs a season and a .700 OPS in Pittsburgh.
This guy had three bombs today, bringing his 2011 home run count up to 16. Who cares if they were against a very shaky Minnesota pitching staff? Three homers are three homers, no matter what team you're facing. Not surprisingly, Bautista leads the league in long balls. As of today at the 40-game mark, he's on pace to hit 65 home runs in 2011. I repeat: WHO IS THIS GUY??
It's not even like he's a two/three outcome guy like Jim Thome or David Ortiz. He's doing everything this season. .368 batting average, .520 slugging, a .868 OPS with 35 walks and just 19 strikeouts Ks at this point in the season. When this dude was on the Pirates, a .250 average was a good season for him.
My next question: How in the world is MVP in the AL going to be decided this year with Cabrera and Cano still tearing it up, with the addition Matt Joyce to the mix with his random breakout season on the Rays? That being said, it's only May, but like the title of this post, this is clearly not a fluke.
This guy had three bombs today, bringing his 2011 home run count up to 16. Who cares if they were against a very shaky Minnesota pitching staff? Three homers are three homers, no matter what team you're facing. Not surprisingly, Bautista leads the league in long balls. As of today at the 40-game mark, he's on pace to hit 65 home runs in 2011. I repeat: WHO IS THIS GUY??
It's not even like he's a two/three outcome guy like Jim Thome or David Ortiz. He's doing everything this season. .368 batting average, .520 slugging, a .868 OPS with 35 walks and just 19 strikeouts Ks at this point in the season. When this dude was on the Pirates, a .250 average was a good season for him.
My next question: How in the world is MVP in the AL going to be decided this year with Cabrera and Cano still tearing it up, with the addition Matt Joyce to the mix with his random breakout season on the Rays? That being said, it's only May, but like the title of this post, this is clearly not a fluke.
Don't get me wrong, I love Jorge, but..
...I think last night may have just been the beginning of the end. As if we didn't already know that was the title of his 2011 season.
Last night, Posada's back "stiffened up", which coincidentally followed his viewing his place in the batting order. Ninth. Posada has already been struggling with becoming the Yankees' DH this season, and the drop in the lineup was just icing on the cake.
Posada was interviewed after the game, and kept trying to get around what he was quoted on prior to the game: "I needed to clear my head". This clearly got him in trouble the second go-round after the game, where that line kept coming up. Reporters were desperate to find something to help them break a "Posada refuses to play if he is penciled in lower than 7th" story. This season, Posada is batting a dismal .165, more than 100 points lower than his lifetime .273.
From the 2009 to 2010 season, his average dropped from a .283 to a .248. Do we see a trend here?
Not everyone can get as lucky as Jason Varitek. Like Posada, he is at the ripe old age of 39, but conversely, has all of a sudden found himself with a group of Boston pitchers demanding to pitch to him and only him. It's not like Varitek's numbers are much better than Posada's. He's batting .154! But Varitek wasn't the hitter that Posada was to begin with. He's a lifetime .257, with just one season in the .290s. There's a reason why Varitek has never subbed in for Big Papi.
I seem to always write letters to Posada, but I feel strongly about this. Dude, if you want to help out the Yankees, QUIT.
Last night, Posada's back "stiffened up", which coincidentally followed his viewing his place in the batting order. Ninth. Posada has already been struggling with becoming the Yankees' DH this season, and the drop in the lineup was just icing on the cake.
Posada was interviewed after the game, and kept trying to get around what he was quoted on prior to the game: "I needed to clear my head". This clearly got him in trouble the second go-round after the game, where that line kept coming up. Reporters were desperate to find something to help them break a "Posada refuses to play if he is penciled in lower than 7th" story. This season, Posada is batting a dismal .165, more than 100 points lower than his lifetime .273.
From the 2009 to 2010 season, his average dropped from a .283 to a .248. Do we see a trend here?
Not everyone can get as lucky as Jason Varitek. Like Posada, he is at the ripe old age of 39, but conversely, has all of a sudden found himself with a group of Boston pitchers demanding to pitch to him and only him. It's not like Varitek's numbers are much better than Posada's. He's batting .154! But Varitek wasn't the hitter that Posada was to begin with. He's a lifetime .257, with just one season in the .290s. There's a reason why Varitek has never subbed in for Big Papi.
I seem to always write letters to Posada, but I feel strongly about this. Dude, if you want to help out the Yankees, QUIT.
Thursday, May 12, 2011
The Morales of the story
I cannot think of a sadder story in major league baseball at the moment than Kendrys Morales. No, I'm not talking about how his name magically changed from Kendry (pronounced ken-dree) to Kendrys (pronounced ken-driss). I'm talking about the poor guy's ankle.
Anyone who's ever played basketball has jumped up for the ball and come down on someone's foot. It's very painful. You can get a bad sprain or even break it in rare instances. But you never hear about the player not being able to return from that injury, But poor Kendrys, back when he was Kendry, hit a game-winning grand slam and joyously leaped into a crowd of his teammates waiting at home plate, only to land on someone's foot and break his ankle so badly that he has already missed a full season and will now miss another for a second round of surgery.
I guess part of why this is so sad is that it was such a random occurrence. Presuming there wasn't something structurally wrong with is ankle to start with, he probably could have repeated that action 1000 times and never had that same result. Yeah, it's kind of stupid, but not "you deserve it" kind of stupid. Like I said, it's just sad.
Anyone who's ever played basketball has jumped up for the ball and come down on someone's foot. It's very painful. You can get a bad sprain or even break it in rare instances. But you never hear about the player not being able to return from that injury, But poor Kendrys, back when he was Kendry, hit a game-winning grand slam and joyously leaped into a crowd of his teammates waiting at home plate, only to land on someone's foot and break his ankle so badly that he has already missed a full season and will now miss another for a second round of surgery.
I guess part of why this is so sad is that it was such a random occurrence. Presuming there wasn't something structurally wrong with is ankle to start with, he probably could have repeated that action 1000 times and never had that same result. Yeah, it's kind of stupid, but not "you deserve it" kind of stupid. Like I said, it's just sad.
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Footwear
My other shoe never drops. That's because if I leave shoes sitting around the house for very long, my wife decides that they don't belong there, picks them up and puts them in the closet.
The Phillies, on the other hand, heard the other shoe drop last night. They've been coasting along, winning most of their games, almost all of which were against bad teams. Even when they played Atlanta earlier in the year, Atlanta was a bad team momentarily. Their record against teams not named the Mets, Padres or Nationals was 5-6 going into last night. It's now 5-7.
Maybe it was fortunate that the Phillies played a weak schedule when they were short-handed, maybe not. Last night, the Phillies got to play against the hottest team in the NL, the Braves, who have been playing good teams and winning. Their record is still mediocre because of their bad start, but this is a very good baseball team. And they have a big advantage over the Phillies in that half their team isn't injured.
The results were pretty predictable, a 5-0 (though I don't count the last 2 runs so much because they came against the execrable Danys Baez who should never sniff the mound during a meaningful game). Cliff Lee was excellent for the most part, striking out 16. However, he made 4 terrible pitches to 4 consecutive batters in one inning and the Braves took advantage. You can tell the Braves are hot because 2 of the hits tipped off the end of Phillies fielders' gloves. But they were all well hit. This netted them 3 runs.
When the Phillies got 2 hits in a row to start the 7th inning, after having none through the first 6, they responded with 3 consecutive strikeouts.
I'm not saying that this game is a season-changer or anything, but it was a pretty strong signal to the Phillies that they're going to have to raise their game during May, when they play almost exclusively against good teams. We'll soon see what they're made of.
The Phillies, on the other hand, heard the other shoe drop last night. They've been coasting along, winning most of their games, almost all of which were against bad teams. Even when they played Atlanta earlier in the year, Atlanta was a bad team momentarily. Their record against teams not named the Mets, Padres or Nationals was 5-6 going into last night. It's now 5-7.
Maybe it was fortunate that the Phillies played a weak schedule when they were short-handed, maybe not. Last night, the Phillies got to play against the hottest team in the NL, the Braves, who have been playing good teams and winning. Their record is still mediocre because of their bad start, but this is a very good baseball team. And they have a big advantage over the Phillies in that half their team isn't injured.
The results were pretty predictable, a 5-0 (though I don't count the last 2 runs so much because they came against the execrable Danys Baez who should never sniff the mound during a meaningful game). Cliff Lee was excellent for the most part, striking out 16. However, he made 4 terrible pitches to 4 consecutive batters in one inning and the Braves took advantage. You can tell the Braves are hot because 2 of the hits tipped off the end of Phillies fielders' gloves. But they were all well hit. This netted them 3 runs.
When the Phillies got 2 hits in a row to start the 7th inning, after having none through the first 6, they responded with 3 consecutive strikeouts.
I'm not saying that this game is a season-changer or anything, but it was a pretty strong signal to the Phillies that they're going to have to raise their game during May, when they play almost exclusively against good teams. We'll soon see what they're made of.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Amusing
Francisco Liriano had not only never pitched a shutout, he had never pitched a complete game. Tonight, Liriano had a no-hitter, the first for the Twins since 1999. Kind of perfect: He had six walks. I don't think it would have been right if he wasn't even a little wild.
Cole Hamels also pitched a complete game tonight. He was spectacular, and that's not just on the mound. Dude got a triple for his first at-bat and hit a screamer off a 98 mph fastball for his last at-bat. Just your average No. 4 starter.
One more thing: Milton Bradley suspended and fined. SHOCKING.
Cole Hamels also pitched a complete game tonight. He was spectacular, and that's not just on the mound. Dude got a triple for his first at-bat and hit a screamer off a 98 mph fastball for his last at-bat. Just your average No. 4 starter.
One more thing: Milton Bradley suspended and fined. SHOCKING.
AL Central: Here's a hole to dig out of
Sorry for the absence. Final exams running rampant in New York City.
Fun fact of the day: If the Cleveland Indians play .500 baseball the rest of the way, the White Sox and Twins have to have a .586 winning percentage to stay in division contention. Gotta love the AL Central.
Fun fact of the day: If the Cleveland Indians play .500 baseball the rest of the way, the White Sox and Twins have to have a .586 winning percentage to stay in division contention. Gotta love the AL Central.
14 Innings on a Sunday night
I am philosophically opposed to leaving baseball games early. More than any other major sport, a baseball game is a self-contained unit, with beginning and end defined only by opportunities rather than time. So if I'm going to a baseball game, I plan to see a game, not a piece of it. Whether or not the score is close and the outcome yet to be decided doesn't really figure into it.
This can be a problematic philosophy at times, in that games can run very long and the weather can be very uncertain. I do occasionally leave during a rain delay, but even that is rare.
Here in Philadelphia, where we are dealing with a particularly involved fan base, there tend to be only two motivations for people to leave early. Either the game is lopsided or the game is long. Sunday night was of the long variety. Since this year's version of the Phillies don't play long 9 inning games (their pitching is too good and their hitters too impatient to drag things out), it took a 14 inning affair to drag things out for the not quite 5 hours I spent at the park. Adding to the fun was that it was a Sunday Night Baseball game on ESPN, meaning it started at 8, an hour later than usual, and the commercial breaks were longer.
On top of everything, the experience was warped by the sudden chants of USA! USA! as people found out about bin Laden. This added a peculiar kind of energy that had nothing to do with the game. Kind of like the wave. Even with that distraction, the crowd began to thin in the 8th inning with the game still ties, and each futile Phillies at bat unleashed a new wave of exits.
Setting aside the ultimate result, the worst thing about long games is the ban on alcohol after the 7th inning. Even beyond Bill Murray's astute observation in favor of such cutoffs (something like "Anyone who can't get drunk by the 8th inning doesn't deserve to have another drink") I understand completely that they don't want people getting completely wasted, but why bother having all those security guards if they don't have some drunk guys to drag out? Seems like a waste. And for me, yeah, I wouldn't have minded having one more beer in the 10th inning.
The biggest positives were the chance to have a 14th inning stretch, complete with another "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" and 2 Bongo Cams, plus getting to ride the subway more than an hour after it was supposed to be closed. I guess they hold a train or two for the transit-riding sorts like myself.
I got home at 1:30 and I was tired and not at all unhappy that I'd stayed.
This can be a problematic philosophy at times, in that games can run very long and the weather can be very uncertain. I do occasionally leave during a rain delay, but even that is rare.
Here in Philadelphia, where we are dealing with a particularly involved fan base, there tend to be only two motivations for people to leave early. Either the game is lopsided or the game is long. Sunday night was of the long variety. Since this year's version of the Phillies don't play long 9 inning games (their pitching is too good and their hitters too impatient to drag things out), it took a 14 inning affair to drag things out for the not quite 5 hours I spent at the park. Adding to the fun was that it was a Sunday Night Baseball game on ESPN, meaning it started at 8, an hour later than usual, and the commercial breaks were longer.
On top of everything, the experience was warped by the sudden chants of USA! USA! as people found out about bin Laden. This added a peculiar kind of energy that had nothing to do with the game. Kind of like the wave. Even with that distraction, the crowd began to thin in the 8th inning with the game still ties, and each futile Phillies at bat unleashed a new wave of exits.
Setting aside the ultimate result, the worst thing about long games is the ban on alcohol after the 7th inning. Even beyond Bill Murray's astute observation in favor of such cutoffs (something like "Anyone who can't get drunk by the 8th inning doesn't deserve to have another drink") I understand completely that they don't want people getting completely wasted, but why bother having all those security guards if they don't have some drunk guys to drag out? Seems like a waste. And for me, yeah, I wouldn't have minded having one more beer in the 10th inning.
The biggest positives were the chance to have a 14th inning stretch, complete with another "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" and 2 Bongo Cams, plus getting to ride the subway more than an hour after it was supposed to be closed. I guess they hold a train or two for the transit-riding sorts like myself.
I got home at 1:30 and I was tired and not at all unhappy that I'd stayed.
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Another good thing about Halladay's game today
I can't believe we actually got to sit and watch a nationally televised game from Philly without the announcers ragging on the Philly fans. It's a truly historic occasion. Of course, everyone knows the Philly fans are awful, horrible, despicable. They throw snowballs at Santa Claus, vomit on little girls and, uh, well, aren't a couple of high profile incidents in 25 years enough?
You can tell how bad the Phillies fans are because they've only sold out, what, 130+ straight games? How pathetic. And the nerve of them, booing. In fact, they booed the umpire after he called a ball after Halladay had started the game with 18 straight strikes. Disgusting. You'd almost think they cared about every pitch the guy makes.
And really, that's my point here. I went to a game a couple of weeks ago when Cliff Lee was pitching. The crowd was hanging on every pitch, reacting to every ball and strike call, even when the game was well in hand in the 7th inning. At that point I remember thinking, that's why Lee, and Halladay, and Oswalt want to pitch here. If you're a professional athlete who's proud of what he does and loves the game, how can you resist playing in front of 45,000 people who feel exactly the same way and are right there with you every step of the way?
Media types love to go on about how "knowledgeable" the fans are here or in New York or Boston. But knowledgeable isn't the point. Why would the players care about knowledgeable? You think they care if the fans understand the infield fly rule? What they want is fans who care and who appreciate effort and performance. And I'm proud to count myself one of them.
You can tell how bad the Phillies fans are because they've only sold out, what, 130+ straight games? How pathetic. And the nerve of them, booing. In fact, they booed the umpire after he called a ball after Halladay had started the game with 18 straight strikes. Disgusting. You'd almost think they cared about every pitch the guy makes.
And really, that's my point here. I went to a game a couple of weeks ago when Cliff Lee was pitching. The crowd was hanging on every pitch, reacting to every ball and strike call, even when the game was well in hand in the 7th inning. At that point I remember thinking, that's why Lee, and Halladay, and Oswalt want to pitch here. If you're a professional athlete who's proud of what he does and loves the game, how can you resist playing in front of 45,000 people who feel exactly the same way and are right there with you every step of the way?
Media types love to go on about how "knowledgeable" the fans are here or in New York or Boston. But knowledgeable isn't the point. Why would the players care about knowledgeable? You think they care if the fans understand the infield fly rule? What they want is fans who care and who appreciate effort and performance. And I'm proud to count myself one of them.
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Now what?
Nice offense from the Phillies last night. Took a Mets fan to the game. He had his first cheese steak and said it was a nice ballpark. He was also glad that we stayed until the end so he could see a couple of Met homers off the absolutely-must-be-sent-to-the-minors-immediately David Herndon (why is he still here? Last year they had to keep him up because he was a Rule 5 pick, but why now?).
One of the reasons I really took to this Phillies team a few years ago is their resilience. They seem capable of overcoming whatever obstacle might come in their way. I think that many of their long-term fans feel similarly, which is the only reason I can think of that people aren't panicking at this point. That and being tied for the best record in baseball.
You have to be impressed that this team that came into the season with maybe even unreasonable expectations can lose their closer, replacement closer, top bullpen lefty, #5 starter, all-star second baseman, catcher and top prospect outfielder to injuries. Plus have their regular number 6, 7 and 8 batters combine for 7 for their last 92 (yes, Raul is not alone- Wilson Valdez is 2/32 while Ibanez is a more robust 2/31).
So it seems to me like this can go one of 3 ways. They can continue to go like this, winning 2 out of every 3 with good pitching and inconsistent offense. They could go in the tank and fall back closer to a .500 record, or (and I think this is most likely), they play .500 ball or slightly better (don't forget, they've played primarily crappy teams so far) until everyone gets back and then go on some kind of tear.
One of the reasons I really took to this Phillies team a few years ago is their resilience. They seem capable of overcoming whatever obstacle might come in their way. I think that many of their long-term fans feel similarly, which is the only reason I can think of that people aren't panicking at this point. That and being tied for the best record in baseball.
You have to be impressed that this team that came into the season with maybe even unreasonable expectations can lose their closer, replacement closer, top bullpen lefty, #5 starter, all-star second baseman, catcher and top prospect outfielder to injuries. Plus have their regular number 6, 7 and 8 batters combine for 7 for their last 92 (yes, Raul is not alone- Wilson Valdez is 2/32 while Ibanez is a more robust 2/31).
So it seems to me like this can go one of 3 ways. They can continue to go like this, winning 2 out of every 3 with good pitching and inconsistent offense. They could go in the tank and fall back closer to a .500 record, or (and I think this is most likely), they play .500 ball or slightly better (don't forget, they've played primarily crappy teams so far) until everyone gets back and then go on some kind of tear.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
If he keeps up this pace...
We're 21 games into the season, slightly more than 1/8 of the way. This means it's time to see how teams and players will do if they keep up their current rate of performance.
Although everyone goes on about how pathetic the San Diego Padres and Seattle Mariners are offensively, they both have more home runs than the defending division champ Minnesota Twins who have amassed 9. If the Fraternals keep up this pace they will finish the year with 67 home runs. Last year their players complained about how hard it was to hit home runs in their home park, but they've been home for only 8 out of 23 games this year and their opponents have 23 homers, so now what's your excuse?
The Phillies have held opponents to a total of 73 runs so far, or 3.32 per game, but the Oakland Athletics have given up the same number in one more game, and so lead the majors with 3.17. At this rate they will give up 517 runs total for the year, as opposed to the Houston Astros, who are on a pace to give up 911. An appropriate number for their pitching staff.
The proving-he-is-not-a-fluke Jose Bautista is on a pace to hit 59 homers and walk 155 times with an OPS of 1.305, and he's doing it with a head only 72% the size of Barry Bonds' head. Where in the world did this guy come from? Before his 54 dingers last year, the most he'd managed in a season was 16. In 2006. For the Pittsburgh Pirates. Well, he did hit 23 in the minors in 2005.
Similarly head volume challenged Ryan Braun is also on a 59 homer pace and could have 148 RBI in the process.
Checking in with 0 home runs are former 30+ types Carlos Pena, Jimmy Rollins and Magglio Ordonez.
We've lost our Internet at home, so I'm going to check out now. More tomorrow, hopefully.
Although everyone goes on about how pathetic the San Diego Padres and Seattle Mariners are offensively, they both have more home runs than the defending division champ Minnesota Twins who have amassed 9. If the Fraternals keep up this pace they will finish the year with 67 home runs. Last year their players complained about how hard it was to hit home runs in their home park, but they've been home for only 8 out of 23 games this year and their opponents have 23 homers, so now what's your excuse?
The Phillies have held opponents to a total of 73 runs so far, or 3.32 per game, but the Oakland Athletics have given up the same number in one more game, and so lead the majors with 3.17. At this rate they will give up 517 runs total for the year, as opposed to the Houston Astros, who are on a pace to give up 911. An appropriate number for their pitching staff.
The proving-he-is-not-a-fluke Jose Bautista is on a pace to hit 59 homers and walk 155 times with an OPS of 1.305, and he's doing it with a head only 72% the size of Barry Bonds' head. Where in the world did this guy come from? Before his 54 dingers last year, the most he'd managed in a season was 16. In 2006. For the Pittsburgh Pirates. Well, he did hit 23 in the minors in 2005.
Similarly head volume challenged Ryan Braun is also on a 59 homer pace and could have 148 RBI in the process.
Checking in with 0 home runs are former 30+ types Carlos Pena, Jimmy Rollins and Magglio Ordonez.
We've lost our Internet at home, so I'm going to check out now. More tomorrow, hopefully.
Monday, April 25, 2011
To follow up, I present to you a letter:
Dear Hip Hip Jorge,
You are not going for some majestic milestone like Jeet and Mo are. They have something to play for, and you honestly do not. Jeet is still the starting shortstop (surprisingly), Mo is still the closer (not surprisingly), and you have finally been kicked out of catching and relegated to DH. And no, you are not the kind of veteran DH who still goes out and kills it like Thome or Vlad or Big Papi. Despite your longevity, you are not a hall-of-famer, and I am guessing you know that.
Sincerely,
Take a page out of Andy Pettitte's book and retire to go spend some time with your family
You are not going for some majestic milestone like Jeet and Mo are. They have something to play for, and you honestly do not. Jeet is still the starting shortstop (surprisingly), Mo is still the closer (not surprisingly), and you have finally been kicked out of catching and relegated to DH. And no, you are not the kind of veteran DH who still goes out and kills it like Thome or Vlad or Big Papi. Despite your longevity, you are not a hall-of-famer, and I am guessing you know that.
Sincerely,
Take a page out of Andy Pettitte's book and retire to go spend some time with your family
Some oddities and not so oddities
Jorge Posada already has six homers this season. I had written something about him defying the laws of nature with his hitting abilities so far into what should be his decline, but I was then informed that those six home runs account for 2/3 of his hits. As in he has nine hits. As in really, he is sliding down the slippery slope of what is definitely a decline, and he is probably not coming back. Given that, my outlook has changed.
Miguel Cabrera is batting .429 right now. To me, this is an oddity because the man should be falling apart. He should have gone to 60-day rehab but didn't end up doing any because the Tigers are so desperate, so he got no help. He is also verging on obese. How is he having another MVP season? Again, April baseball, but at this point we know Cabrera hitting for average is not a fluke.
On the other hand, the previously hotshot pair of Florida Marlins Dan Uggla and Jorge Cantu are both batting significantly under .200. These guys used to be monsters at the plate.
Not so oddity (and kind of humorous) fact that I just found out: Phil Hughes' absence is due to "arm fatigue". For lack of a better phrase, DUH. The Yankees ruin their pitchers, 'nuff said.
Miguel Cabrera is batting .429 right now. To me, this is an oddity because the man should be falling apart. He should have gone to 60-day rehab but didn't end up doing any because the Tigers are so desperate, so he got no help. He is also verging on obese. How is he having another MVP season? Again, April baseball, but at this point we know Cabrera hitting for average is not a fluke.
On the other hand, the previously hotshot pair of Florida Marlins Dan Uggla and Jorge Cantu are both batting significantly under .200. These guys used to be monsters at the plate.
Not so oddity (and kind of humorous) fact that I just found out: Phil Hughes' absence is due to "arm fatigue". For lack of a better phrase, DUH. The Yankees ruin their pitchers, 'nuff said.
Checking in from Ivy League Baseball
Quick break from the Majors, folks (although not really because I can't get Halladay off the mind). I spent my entire day at Princeton University, watching the Columbia-Princeton doubleheader. It was unpleasantly muggy, but one of the perks of being press even in the Ivy League is press box privlidges (I apparently don't know how to spell this word...someone help me out here). I interesting found out that three Princeton grads are now in the majors: San Diego's Will Venable, Mets Chris Young, and Pittsburgh's Ross Oldendorf. Who knew, right? Not like any of these guys are spectacular, but for the Ivies I'd say that's still impressive. Lou Gehrig, who will always hold a place deep in my heart despite me sadly never being able to see him play, still takes the cake for Ivy player in the majors. Where does he hold the all-time home run record? Yep, Columbia.
I didn't get internet service in the press box unfortunately, but my faint reception on my phone showed me Halladay's insanely spectacular outing. 12 Ks in 7 innings? He proves time and time again that he is only part man, and part machine. Granted, he was pitching against the Padres, who have a sad excuse for a lineup at this point with the giant hole left by Gonzalez, but still.
I know this isn't much of a post, but I want to make sure I don't get outdone by my dad. In two weeks I will be out of school and will have infinitely more time to write on here with much more intelligent and coherent thoughts.
Finals thoughts: Still don't quite know how Mike Napoli and Melky Cabrera with Ryan Raburn closer behind are leading our rotisserie team in batting. April baseball, gotta love it.
I didn't get internet service in the press box unfortunately, but my faint reception on my phone showed me Halladay's insanely spectacular outing. 12 Ks in 7 innings? He proves time and time again that he is only part man, and part machine. Granted, he was pitching against the Padres, who have a sad excuse for a lineup at this point with the giant hole left by Gonzalez, but still.
I know this isn't much of a post, but I want to make sure I don't get outdone by my dad. In two weeks I will be out of school and will have infinitely more time to write on here with much more intelligent and coherent thoughts.
Finals thoughts: Still don't quite know how Mike Napoli and Melky Cabrera with Ryan Raburn closer behind are leading our rotisserie team in batting. April baseball, gotta love it.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
This one goes to 11
It's very odd to look at the current standings because in the National League, 9 out of 16 teams have 10 or 11 losses (look at the top 5 teams in the Central Division) and in the AL East 4 out of 5 teams have lost exactly 11. That's one big steaming pile of mediocrity any way you want to look at it.
Given that, you really have to give credit to the Phillies, Rockies and yes, the Yankees for separating themselves from the pack. I know even those teams' fans are fretting over this and that, but I don't think they're going to get a large segment of the public to sympathize.
Given that, you really have to give credit to the Phillies, Rockies and yes, the Yankees for separating themselves from the pack. I know even those teams' fans are fretting over this and that, but I don't think they're going to get a large segment of the public to sympathize.
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Unusual play
I was at this game and actually looked away for a moment and was confused about what had happened.
MLB video
MLB video
Early season sense and nonsense
Part of the fun of early season baseball is trying to figure out which among the hot teams and players are for real and which ones are flukes.
The most interesting early season standings are in both leagues' Central Divisions, where in the NL, the top 4 teams are essentially tied and in the AL where the Cleveland Indians, picked by many to finish last, are in first place, looking impressive, and accumulating a bandwagon among the pundits, if not their fans (though it may be 35 degree damp weather that lacks fans rather than the team itself). Hot in pursuit of the Indians are the surprising Kansas City Royals, followed not so closely by perennial contenders Chicago, Detroit and Minnesota.
So when I look at coolstandings.com, a site that updates playoff odds on a daily basis, why do they show clear favorites in both divisions? It's not because of the records, it's because of the runs. If you look closely at the NL Central, you can see that St. Louis has outscored its opponents 108-78. Feed this into what Bill James calls the Pythagorean Theorem (runs scored squared divided by sum of runs scored squared plus runs allowed squared equals winning percentage) of baseball and you get a .650 winning percentage, far above the team's actual .550. This implies that the Cardinals are underperforming and are likely to do better as the season progresses. Cincinnati and Milwaukee, on the other hand are only slightly underperforming and should do better, but not as well as St. Louis. The Cubbies have scored few runs than they've allowed and are projected to a .380 winning percentage, which translates to 61 wins for the season.
In most of the other divisions, teams are performing about how you'd expect. Atlanta is a clear underperformer. It's hard to be 9-12 when you've outscored your opponents overall. In the AL Central, the Indians have the highest run differential in baseball, 99 scored vs. 66 allowed. This suggests that their fast start is not a fluke, while the Royals have only a 104-94 differential, having won a great many close games. That's still good, but projects to a more .500 kind of record. The defending division champ Twins have the worst run differential in baseball, 57-89. You don't want to know what that projects to.
Obviously, this is not the only measure one uses in projecting team performance, but combine it with strength of schedule and how closely players' performance relates to their actual skills, and you can get a decent picture of how it lays out. Coolstandings includes a strength of schedule component, which is why their projected wins are not just their Pythagorean projection.
The most interesting early season standings are in both leagues' Central Divisions, where in the NL, the top 4 teams are essentially tied and in the AL where the Cleveland Indians, picked by many to finish last, are in first place, looking impressive, and accumulating a bandwagon among the pundits, if not their fans (though it may be 35 degree damp weather that lacks fans rather than the team itself). Hot in pursuit of the Indians are the surprising Kansas City Royals, followed not so closely by perennial contenders Chicago, Detroit and Minnesota.
So when I look at coolstandings.com, a site that updates playoff odds on a daily basis, why do they show clear favorites in both divisions? It's not because of the records, it's because of the runs. If you look closely at the NL Central, you can see that St. Louis has outscored its opponents 108-78. Feed this into what Bill James calls the Pythagorean Theorem (runs scored squared divided by sum of runs scored squared plus runs allowed squared equals winning percentage) of baseball and you get a .650 winning percentage, far above the team's actual .550. This implies that the Cardinals are underperforming and are likely to do better as the season progresses. Cincinnati and Milwaukee, on the other hand are only slightly underperforming and should do better, but not as well as St. Louis. The Cubbies have scored few runs than they've allowed and are projected to a .380 winning percentage, which translates to 61 wins for the season.
In most of the other divisions, teams are performing about how you'd expect. Atlanta is a clear underperformer. It's hard to be 9-12 when you've outscored your opponents overall. In the AL Central, the Indians have the highest run differential in baseball, 99 scored vs. 66 allowed. This suggests that their fast start is not a fluke, while the Royals have only a 104-94 differential, having won a great many close games. That's still good, but projects to a more .500 kind of record. The defending division champ Twins have the worst run differential in baseball, 57-89. You don't want to know what that projects to.
Obviously, this is not the only measure one uses in projecting team performance, but combine it with strength of schedule and how closely players' performance relates to their actual skills, and you can get a decent picture of how it lays out. Coolstandings includes a strength of schedule component, which is why their projected wins are not just their Pythagorean projection.
Friday, April 22, 2011
Pessimism pisses people off but it makes for an amusing dynamic
I am really awful sometimes when it comes to baseball. I realize this. I complain and exaggerate. But what fan doesn't? Fine, Cliff Lee didn't "SUCK" this week. I'm just saying, Roy Halladay should never be lit up and Lee should never pitch just six innings with just two strikeouts. Is that so much to ask?
In other news, Angel Pagan is about to be put on the DL. Happy days.
Fun fact: Derek Jeter is currently leading the league in groundouts.
Not so fun fact: Brett Gardner is probably going to the minors.
Funny: Carl Crawford has an OPS below .400. That's what you get when you make a deal with the devil.
In other news, Angel Pagan is about to be put on the DL. Happy days.
Fun fact: Derek Jeter is currently leading the league in groundouts.
Not so fun fact: Brett Gardner is probably going to the minors.
Funny: Carl Crawford has an OPS below .400. That's what you get when you make a deal with the devil.
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Commanding
The 5 Phillies starters have a collectively struck out 98 batters and walked 21. That's a 4.7 to 1 ratio. Anything over 2:1 is considered very good. I scanned the top major league pitchers and could only find a few individual pitchers in that neighborhood (Dan Haren 27 K, 2 BB!). For the most part, pitchers have limited control over what happens once balls are in play, so keeping balls out of play (AKA strikeouts) and not allowing extra baserunners with walks is one of the most accurate predictors of pitchers' success. On that measure at least, things are looking promising for this group of starters.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
I credit my dad for my initial interest in baseball, but now this love is all mine
I can definitely credit my dad for my initial interest in baseball. I think before it was even determined if he was having a girl or boy, he had decided to make sure that at least one of his children would be as obsessed with the game as he is.
Enter daughter. I have been raised on baseball from the very beginning. I learned how to score a game when I was six. My dad bought me a children's scorekeeping book that had cute little outlined spaces for ticket stubs and headings for the team matchups. I had the luxury of experiencing my first baseball games at the now sadly deceased (hah!) Veteran's stadium. The Phillies were okay at that point, obviously nothing like they are now. In those days they were kind of just expected to finish second to the Braves every year. It's funny thinking about it now, because our starting rotation now is consistently compared to that power staff--Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz. Speaking of Maddux, he was my first baseball card.
Most weekends growing up, I played Strat-o-matic baseball with my dad. This was probably the catalyst in increasing my interest and knowledge in baseball. I usually played with the Yankees, and my dad would pick another American League team (Phillies aside, NL teams aren't really quite as fun...). Did I mention my first obsession was the Yankees? We all go through phases, no judging, please. Anyway, as I grew up I really only knew the Yankees, kind of the Phillies, but not much else. Don't worry, I am a fully converted fan now and will never go back to the dark side. Anyway, at some point in my high school years, my interest in baseball skyrocked. And this wasn't just about the Phillies, it was everything about the game. I immersed myself in baseball. I wrote my college Common Application essay about baseball. I watched MLB.tv instead of doing homework (this is still true even now that I'm in college). I listen to MLB on XM like it is my job. Oh, and I now write a baseball beat for the Columbia Spectator...pretty sweet gig, right?
I may have not seen those amazing Yankees teams that my dad got to watch in nosebleed seats in the 70s, but I have gotten to witness some pretty cool stuff myself. The 2008 World Series win, for one thing. Cliff Lee's return to Philly. Pat Burrell "running". Wilson Valdez's killer arm (if you don't know who this is, shame on you). Beckett's domination of the Yankees to win the 2003 World Series for the Marlins at Yankees stadium. Ryan Madson's scarily accurate pie-ing-in-the-face of any Phillies players of the game. You get the idea.
I promise not to stop writing either. Being a baseball fan stuck in an all-girls school combined with being a Phillies fan in the heart of Yankees/Mets territory is not an easy life. I need an outlet somewhere.
Enter daughter. I have been raised on baseball from the very beginning. I learned how to score a game when I was six. My dad bought me a children's scorekeeping book that had cute little outlined spaces for ticket stubs and headings for the team matchups. I had the luxury of experiencing my first baseball games at the now sadly deceased (hah!) Veteran's stadium. The Phillies were okay at that point, obviously nothing like they are now. In those days they were kind of just expected to finish second to the Braves every year. It's funny thinking about it now, because our starting rotation now is consistently compared to that power staff--Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz. Speaking of Maddux, he was my first baseball card.
Most weekends growing up, I played Strat-o-matic baseball with my dad. This was probably the catalyst in increasing my interest and knowledge in baseball. I usually played with the Yankees, and my dad would pick another American League team (Phillies aside, NL teams aren't really quite as fun...). Did I mention my first obsession was the Yankees? We all go through phases, no judging, please. Anyway, as I grew up I really only knew the Yankees, kind of the Phillies, but not much else. Don't worry, I am a fully converted fan now and will never go back to the dark side. Anyway, at some point in my high school years, my interest in baseball skyrocked. And this wasn't just about the Phillies, it was everything about the game. I immersed myself in baseball. I wrote my college Common Application essay about baseball. I watched MLB.tv instead of doing homework (this is still true even now that I'm in college). I listen to MLB on XM like it is my job. Oh, and I now write a baseball beat for the Columbia Spectator...pretty sweet gig, right?
I may have not seen those amazing Yankees teams that my dad got to watch in nosebleed seats in the 70s, but I have gotten to witness some pretty cool stuff myself. The 2008 World Series win, for one thing. Cliff Lee's return to Philly. Pat Burrell "running". Wilson Valdez's killer arm (if you don't know who this is, shame on you). Beckett's domination of the Yankees to win the 2003 World Series for the Marlins at Yankees stadium. Ryan Madson's scarily accurate pie-ing-in-the-face of any Phillies players of the game. You get the idea.
I promise not to stop writing either. Being a baseball fan stuck in an all-girls school combined with being a Phillies fan in the heart of Yankees/Mets territory is not an easy life. I need an outlet somewhere.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Just for the record
I checked and the Phillie Phanatic seems to have a different birthday every year. They shouldn't be deceiving little kids like that.
Introduction
This being my first baseball blog, I'll start off with a short history of my baseball life.
I started watching baseball in 1962, when I was 7. It was the year of the Amazin' Mets, losers of historical proportion. Maybe it was because the Mets had no history like the Dodgers and Giants, but at that time it didn't seem to be a problem to root for both the Mets and the Yankees, and so I did. By the time I was 13, I was taking the subway to games every day it was possible, which added up to around 30 games a summer. I sat in the upper deck, $1.50 at Yankee Stadium and $1.30 at Shea. It's a perspective on the game I still value.
I have been lucky enough in the course of my life to attend 10 World Series. The Mets-Orioles in 1969, Yankees-Dodgers in 1977 and 1978, Orioles-Pirates in 1979, Phillies-Toronto in 1993, Yankees-Atlanta in 1996, Yankees-Mets in 2000, Yankees-Florida in 2003, and the Phillies in 2008 and 2009. I saw the final game of 6 of them. I've been a partial season ticket holder for the Phillies since the late 1990's and have averaged 25-30 games a year since the Phils moved into Citizens Bank Park. I estimate I've seen somewhere north of 1000 games in about a dozen different ballparks.
I saw Sandy Koufax pitch once. I saw Reggie Jackson hit home runs on 3 consecutive swings in the 1977 World Series. I saw Frank Tanana set the record for strikeouts by a lefty in 1975 and saw Ron Guidry break it in 1978. I finally saw my first no-hitter when Roy Halladay did it in the playoffs last year.
I have also been playing Strat-O-Matic Baseball since 1967 and Rotisserie League Baseball, the original fantasy sports game, since 1984, the year the original book and official rules were published.
Do I know everything about baseball? Absolutely not, what would be the fun of that? But I've seen enough to appreciate and love it and to want to write about it, along with my daughter. There's a lot baseball writing out there, so we will do our utmost to provide some kind of unique insight and have some fun doing it. And we promise not to write 10 things in the next few weeks and then flame out.
I started watching baseball in 1962, when I was 7. It was the year of the Amazin' Mets, losers of historical proportion. Maybe it was because the Mets had no history like the Dodgers and Giants, but at that time it didn't seem to be a problem to root for both the Mets and the Yankees, and so I did. By the time I was 13, I was taking the subway to games every day it was possible, which added up to around 30 games a summer. I sat in the upper deck, $1.50 at Yankee Stadium and $1.30 at Shea. It's a perspective on the game I still value.
I have been lucky enough in the course of my life to attend 10 World Series. The Mets-Orioles in 1969, Yankees-Dodgers in 1977 and 1978, Orioles-Pirates in 1979, Phillies-Toronto in 1993, Yankees-Atlanta in 1996, Yankees-Mets in 2000, Yankees-Florida in 2003, and the Phillies in 2008 and 2009. I saw the final game of 6 of them. I've been a partial season ticket holder for the Phillies since the late 1990's and have averaged 25-30 games a year since the Phils moved into Citizens Bank Park. I estimate I've seen somewhere north of 1000 games in about a dozen different ballparks.
I saw Sandy Koufax pitch once. I saw Reggie Jackson hit home runs on 3 consecutive swings in the 1977 World Series. I saw Frank Tanana set the record for strikeouts by a lefty in 1975 and saw Ron Guidry break it in 1978. I finally saw my first no-hitter when Roy Halladay did it in the playoffs last year.
I have also been playing Strat-O-Matic Baseball since 1967 and Rotisserie League Baseball, the original fantasy sports game, since 1984, the year the original book and official rules were published.
Do I know everything about baseball? Absolutely not, what would be the fun of that? But I've seen enough to appreciate and love it and to want to write about it, along with my daughter. There's a lot baseball writing out there, so we will do our utmost to provide some kind of unique insight and have some fun doing it. And we promise not to write 10 things in the next few weeks and then flame out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)